While AWS (Amazon Web Service) remains the world leader in cloud computing, GCP has announced new data storage and processing solutions in order to narrow the gap between the two companies. With AlloyDB, GCP believes it will be able to directly compete with existing offerings from companies such as Oracle, IBM or Microsoft by offering classic functionality in a modern, cloud-native package. He estimates that AlloyDB is twice as fast for transactional workloads as Aurora PostgreSQL from AWS and four times faster than standard PostgreSQL for the same workloads.
Additionally, AlloyDB is said to be up to 100 times faster for analytical requests than the standard version of PostgreSQL. We have a lot of customers, including travel agencies, retailers, car manufacturers, or financial services who have purchased these very expensive proprietary databases and are really trying to break free from them and go open source. We can guess the reasons why customers want to change supplier. Cost is certainly part of that, but there are a lot of prohibitive licensing terms, says Andi Gutmans, GCP’s general manager and vice president of databases.
They are audited. There are a lot of practices, I would say, unfriendly, he added. Gutmans spent several years at AWS before joining Google as general manager and vice president of engineering for its database products in 2020. If we add to the points listed by Gutmans the fact that Postgres is today ‘today ‘today has become something of a de facto standard for open source relational databases (and a decline of MySQL), we understand better why Google decided to offer a dedicated and powerful PostgreSQL service. Gutmans believes customers should love AlloyDB.
AlloyDB is a fully gr and PostgreSQL compatible database service. If you’re used to the GCP ecosystem, an all-gr PostgreSQL database service might sound familiar. After all, the company already offers CloudSQL for PostgreSQL and Spanner, Google Cloud’s all-gr relational database service, also offers a PostgreSQL interface. But these different services simply allow an interface compatible with PostgreSQL to allow developers with these skills to use them.
AlloyDB is the standard PostgreSQL database base, although the team have modified the core to allow it to make best use of Google’s infrastructure, while allowing the team to stay up to date with new releases as soon as they are released. . Second, technically, the AlloyDB team relies on Google’s existing infrastructure, which disaggregates compute and storage. This is the same infrastructure layer that powers Spanner, BigQuery, and all of Google’s services as well. According to Gutmans, this already gives the service a leg up on its competitors.
He explained that AlloyDB focuses specifically on PostgreSQL and nothing else. You don’t always have the ability to optimize so much when you have to support more than one [moteur de base de donnes et langage de requte]. We decided that what companies ask us [c’est] Postgres for these legacy database migrations, so let’s just do the best in Postgres, he said. For example, the changes made by the gear to the Postgres core now allow it to fly the system linearly to more than 64 virtual cores.
On the analytics side, the team developed a machine-learning-based personal caching service to learn a client’s access patterns and then convert Postgres’ row format to a column-based format. memory that can be analyzed much faster. AlloyDB will be hosted in Google Cloud and done as a service. In that regard, Gutmans told the conference on Wednesday that the new pricing model is designed to be simpler and free from the kind of hidden fees that often create large, unexpected bills.
For example, Google’s model does not include an entry/exit (I/O) charge, a common surcharge in some contracts from cloud service providers like AWS. Google’s new offering joins those of several other companies that are developing database products around PostgreSQL. Some cloud service providers, such as DigitalOcean, Vultr, and AWS, offer gre versions of popular open source databases like MySQL, Redis, and PostgreSQL. These products provide the standard version of the database.
These solutions also take care of much of the software installation, server configuration, and updating tasks as new security patches emerge. Meanwhile, other companies are building more polished versions around the open-source database, while adding a few new features that allow them to create a new brand. Companies like Yugabyte and Fly.io create versions of PostgreSQL that scale to large datasets distributed around the world.
They give a large part of the data synchronization tasks between the different instances and shards. Some companies like Oracle and PlanetScale are doing something similar with MySQL, another popular open source option. Google aims to set itself apart with faster performance and a rock-solid SLA. The company has written some basic storage routines to speed up transactional and analytical requests. AlloyDB will provide users with the ability to configure storage to suit their usage pattern.
Source: Google Cloud
What is your opinion on the subject?
What do you think of Google’s new AlloyDB product?
What do you think of the results of the benchmark tests of AlloyDB AWS Aurora and the standard version of Postgres?
See as well
Google will shut down free G Suite accounts if the account holder doesn’t upgrade to a paid account, users have until May to checkout
86% of hacked Google Cloud accounts are used for illegal cryptomining, with other attacks involving port scanning other targets on the internet, according to AtlasVPN
Google announces Cloud TPU virtual machines for AI workloads, designed to run machine learning models with AI services on Google Cloud
Google introduces CloudSQL for Microsoft SQL Server, a full gr service, to be offered to Google Cloud Platform customers